Author summary
9% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,130 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stuart Henderson results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 580 hits . Analysis detected 3,218 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,397 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,394 of 6,629 authors). This Stuart Henderson is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group. Stuart Henderson
Author details
Total words: 7,397
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% No True Scotsman: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.1% Middle Ground: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst