Keyword summary
38% 12 analyzed articles/videos 1,497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spurs results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 5,207 hits . Analysis detected 32,320 faulty-reasoning hits from 40,230 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (29,907 of 35,449 keywords). This Spurs is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group. Spurs
Keyword details
Total words: 40,230
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score12 analyzed articles40.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.9% 12.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst