Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Fiifi Frimpong results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 701 hits . Analysis detected 3,455 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,084 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Fiifi Frimpong is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Fiifi Frimpong
Author details
Total words: 3,084
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 22.7% 22.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 12.2% 12.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.9% 10.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Author 22.7%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 12.2%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst