Author summary
0% 12 analyzed articles/videos 6,663 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kristian Winfield results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 6,252 hits . Analysis detected 39,095 faulty-reasoning hits from 40,601 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,347 of 6,140 authors). This Kristian Winfield is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group. Kristian Winfield
Author details
Total words: 40,601
Article count: 12
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score12 analyzed articles40.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst