Author summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,129 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Sblendorio results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and In-Group Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 1,312 hits . Analysis detected 12,732 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,889 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (4,898 of 6,162 authors). This Peter Sblendorio is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group. Peter Sblendorio
Author details
Total words: 17,889
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles17.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.8% 2.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst