Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,706 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Lupica results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.2% saturation with 3,450 hits . Analysis detected 19,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,150 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,313 of 6,138 authors). This Mike Lupica is worse (more manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group. Mike Lupica
Author details
Total words: 13,150
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.3% percentile 3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 26.2% 26.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.5% 7.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 7.5% 7.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.5% 12.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.2%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 14.0%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst