Author summary
53% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,846 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caroline Eggers results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 868 hits . Analysis detected 6,262 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,584 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,694 of 6,194 authors). This Caroline Eggers is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group. Caroline Eggers
Author details
Total words: 7,584
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.0% 3.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.6% 3.6% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst