WPLN12%

Nashville just neared its dew point record. Why that’s dangerous for heat, flooding 10%

By Caroline Eggers44%

7/24/2026, 9:30:44 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 32.2% saturation with 154 hits. Analysis detected 604 faulty-reasoning hits from 479 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.7% and a BS Rank of 10% (19,789 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.40% of the article peer group.

Nashville reached tropical moisture levels during the latest summer heatwave this week. 
To understand the general feeling of mugginess, weather forecasters look to the “dew point,” which measures when air can hold no more moisture at a given temperature. 
The higher the dew point, the higher the heat index, and the harder it becomes for the human body to cool off through the evaporation of sweat. 
Higher dew points also raise the potential for high amounts of rainfall during a storm. 
The National Weather Service says humidity may start to feel oppressive with dew points at or above 65 degrees. 
The dew point reached 77 degrees at Nashville’s airport station on Monday, not far off from the city’s record. 
For reference, an actual temperature of at least 88 degrees Fahrenheit paired with that dew point translates to a heat index of 100 degrees. 
In fact, the city reached 93 degrees earlier that day. 
On Tuesday, the city’s heat index peaked at about 105 degrees, with a dew point peak of 75. 
Nearly 1.5 inches of rain fell by day’s end. 
Near-record territory 
Nashville recorded its highest dew point of 82 degrees on August 15, 1995. 
The city has only reached or exceeded a dew point of 80 degrees during two heatwave events, on July 14, 2015, and August 13-15, 1995, according to city data stored with the Iowa Environmental Mesonet. 
The city also neared its record for  precipitable water” value (PWAT) , which measures the amount of moisture in the lower level of the atmosphere. 
Nashville’s average PWAT this time of year is a level of about 1.4 inches, and the city measured “at least” 2.2 inches on Monday, according to NWS. 
This week, dew points climbed even higher elsewhere in Middle Tennessee. 
Clarksville’s dew point reached at least 79 degrees, Spring Hill hit 80, Dickson County and Maury County reached 82, and Sparta reached 82.4 degrees, according to NWS data. 
Some counties in western Kentucky broke records for dew points in recent days. 
Hopkins County set a new record Tuesday with a dew point of 85 degrees , according to the Kentucky Mesonet, which has station data dating back to 2008. 
At least seven other stations recorded dew points of at least 83 degrees this week, bringing heat indices over 110 degrees. 
Temperatures are seasonably warm at midday statewide, but high dew point air is the bigger story today. 
The dew point temperature at our site in Graves County near Mayfield reads a VERY muggy 84F, resulting in a heat index of 114F! 
pic.twitter.com/104C8wLMDE 
Globally, the highest dew point ever recorded was 95 degrees Fahrenheit at Dhahran, Saudi Arabia in 2003. 
Combined with the actual air temperature of 108 degrees, the city’s heat index reached 178 degrees  the highest ever documented on Earth. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 2.6%WPLN: 2.3%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Caroline Eggers: 2.3%WPLN: 0.7%Anchoring Bias7.5%This article: 7.5%Caroline Eggers: 4.8%WPLN: 3.8%Availability Heuristic7.5%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 2.5%WPLN: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.7%Caroline Eggers: 0.1%WPLN: 0.3%Hindsight Bias2.7%This article: 15.4%Caroline Eggers: 0.8%WPLN: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias15.4%This article: 6.1%Caroline Eggers: 4.8%WPLN: 4.0%Framing Effect6.1%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.9%WPLN: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.8%WPLN: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 2.5%WPLN: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 2.7%WPLN: 1.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.0%Caroline Eggers: 10.4%WPLN: 7.4%Negativity Bias14.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 1.0%WPLN: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.1%WPLN: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.0%WPLN: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.0%WPLN: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.2%WPLN: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.4%Caroline Eggers: 1.3%WPLN: 1.6%Recency Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.3%WPLN: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 1.0%WPLN: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 32.2%Caroline Eggers: 4.5%WPLN: 3.2%Appeal to Authority32.2%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.3%WPLN: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 2.0%WPLN: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.7%Caroline Eggers: 3.6%WPLN: 3.9%Hasty Generalization2.7%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.0%WPLN: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.4%WPLN: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 11.1%Caroline Eggers: 4.3%WPLN: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion11.1%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.3%WPLN: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 1.2%WPLN: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.6%WPLN: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.4%WPLN: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.2%WPLN: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 4.5%WPLN: 2.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 14.2%Caroline Eggers: 3.8%WPLN: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)14.2%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.4%WPLN: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.4%Caroline Eggers: 2.5%WPLN: 1.5%Unattributed Quote8.4%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.2%WPLN: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 4.2%WPLN: 1.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 1.0%WPLN: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 2.9%WPLN: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Caroline Eggers: 0.4%WPLN: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

479 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers29%attributed speech342writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageNational Weather Service • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageIowa Environmental Mesonet • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageNational Weather Service • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageNational Weather Service • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageKentucky Mesonet • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
74 attributed words54% of attributed speech63% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-11.7 ptsWriter: 11.7%National Weather Service: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.