Publication summary
12% 26 analyzed articles/videos 13,719 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WPLN results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 4,824 hits . Analysis detected 42,730 faulty-reasoning hits from 63,673 analyzed words across 26 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 17% (315 of 379 publications). This WPLN is better (less manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 63,673
Article count: 26
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.9% percentile 1.3% BS Score26 analyzed articles63.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst