wpln.org12%

‘The Odyssey’ is drawing crowds out around the clock to see it in IMAX 70mm 55%

By Justin Barney79%

7/20/2026, 8:05:31 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Recency Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 199 hits. Analysis detected 1,641 faulty-reasoning hits from 958 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 52.9% and a BS Rank of 55% (9,928 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the article peer group.

Seeing The Odyssey in 70mm IMAX 
In the projection booth at Regal Opry Mills 
The hottest ticket in town right now is for a movie: “The Odyssey” is in theaters. 
And there is only one screen in all of Nashville where you can see it as director Christopher Nolan intended, in 70 millimeter IMAX. 
IMAX projectionist Dean Fick points his headlamp at a 500 pound reel of film in the darkened projection booth at Regal Opry Mills 
“When I push the button, this platter will start to spin at what seems like an alarming rate of speed” says Dean Fick. 
“We have to get 300 feet of film per minute going through this projector.” 
This is not how movies are done anymore. 
In fact, a movie has never been made this way. 
Christopher Nolan’s “The Odyssey,” is the very first film to be shot from start to finish in IMAX 70 millimeter. 
The Belcourt Theater in town is showing “The Odyssey” in 35 millimeter, which is standard. 
Their projectionist, Bob Roberts, explains the difference. 
“It’s the size of the film. 
The actual film that the images are printed on. 
The bigger it is, the more dense the picture quality can be. 70 millimeter has a denser picture quality than 35, so you can pack that much more information into a bigger space.” 
It’s literally as close to real life as humanly possible. 
Most new TVs at home display images in 4K, IMAX 70 millimeter delivers something closer to 18K. 
No one has ever made a movie this way before because it’s incredibly cumbersome. 
It’s on actual film. 
The cartridges for the camera only carry enough for three and a half minutes of film. 
You’re stuck with the take you got in production. 
Film is heavy. 
It’s LOUD. 
And the film itself? 
It costs a fortune. 
Hollywood just hasn’t seen filming in IMAX 70mm as economically viable. 
Regal Opry Mills is a “no compromise” IMAX theater 
When movies went digital, projectionist Dave Fick says they just started destroying IMAX projectors. 
“Fortunately, not all of the film projectors were destroyed. 
And I will be honest with you, I thought that film was never, ever gonna come back because it’s so much more expensive than the digital.” 
But Christopher Nolan is obsessed with IMAX. 
With this movie, he is proving that there is an audience for it. 
Only one place in Nashville is equipped to show the film as Nolan wished: Regal Opry Mills. 
It’s could seem that the distribution is unfair since there is only one place in Nashville to see it in IMAX, but there are actually only 41 screens in the world that are capable of screening IMAX 70 millimeter film. 
And Fick says that the Regal Opry Mills is even more special than that. 
“This particular theater also is a no-compromise IMAX theater. 
A lot of the newer IMAX theaters that came out from, say, 2010 onward are retrofits. 
Meaning what they would do at a typical multiplex is they would come by and they would take the tallest or the largest room or theater in the multiplex and then install a floor-to-ceiling IMAX screen and call that IMAX. 
Whereas this particular theater is a no-compromise IMAX built for IMAX, and then other things came later. 
So it has the true 1.43:1 aspect ratio.” 
Fick himself represents the Regal’s commitment to IMAX. 
He doesn’t even live here. 
He lives in Ohio. 
And he’s retired. 
He has been projecting IMAX for over 40 years. 
There are so few people who know how to project in 70 millimeter that Regal pulled him out of retirement for one last ride. 
Regal has three IMAX projectionists working in shifts to satisfy demand. 
The hottest ticket in town 
Getting tickets for The Odyssey has been like getting tickets to a major sporting event. 
It’s the first movie ever to start selling tickets a year before the first screening. 
”It sold out quite quickly” says Regal Cinema SVP of US Content, Brooks LeBoeuf. 
“For us, it was within the first 24 hours it was sold out for the IMAX.” 
So they added showtimes. 
There are screenings from 7AM to 11PM. 
Regal said that they would have added a 3AM screening if they had more trained IMAX projectionists like Fick. 
“When you have filmmakers of Christopher Nolan’s quality who are making films like this, there’s an economic case to be made. 
And we can see it demonstrated right here because I’m sure in this sell-out house there are people who have probably used frequent flyer mileage or spent their own funds to fly into Nashville to watch this particular showing.” 
And Nolan’s ambition is paying off. 
Forbes reports that The Odyssey took in over $260 million dollars this weekend . 
That’s the most this year for any live action film and a personal best opening weekend ever for Christopher Nolan. 
As a movie lover and business man, Regal’s LeBoeuf sees why Nolan’s gamble paid off. 
“I mean, listen, it’s a 3,000-year-old story, and it’s being told with the biggest canvas ever invented. 
I think that there’s something that Nolan saw with that, that he wanted to pay it the respect that it deserves. 
A frame so big that it fills your entire field of vision from floor to ceiling. 
You’re not just watching Odysseus’ voyage, you’re on the ship.” 
He said it could provide a roadmap for future IMAX 70mm films and inspire other directors to shoot in the format. 
Right now, Regal Opry Mills has a four-week contract to show The Odyssey . 
It will run until August 15th, but it could be there longer if demand continues. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.1%Justin Barney: 4.5%WPLN: 2.3%Confirmation Bias8.1%This article: 1.8%Justin Barney: 1.2%WPLN: 0.7%Anchoring Bias1.8%This article: 6.5%Justin Barney: 3.5%WPLN: 3.8%Availability Heuristic6.5%This article: 1.8%Justin Barney: 0.6%WPLN: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic1.8%This article: 2.2%Justin Barney: 0.7%WPLN: 0.3%Hindsight Bias2.2%This article: 2.7%Justin Barney: 1.3%WPLN: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias2.7%This article: 7.6%Justin Barney: 3.2%WPLN: 4.0%Framing Effect7.6%This article: 1.6%Justin Barney: 0.5%WPLN: 0.4%Loss Aversion1.6%This article: 7.9%Justin Barney: 2.6%WPLN: 0.7%Status Quo Bias7.9%This article: 2.5%Justin Barney: 0.8%WPLN: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect2.5%This article: 7.0%Justin Barney: 4.5%WPLN: 2.8%Optimism Bias7.0%This article: 4.2%Justin Barney: 2.3%WPLN: 1.0%Pessimism Bias4.2%This article: 2.8%Justin Barney: 0.9%WPLN: 7.4%Negativity Bias2.8%This article: 3.5%Justin Barney: 1.2%WPLN: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias3.5%This article: 2.7%Justin Barney: 0.9%WPLN: 0.3%Fundamental Attribution Error2.7%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%Justin Barney: 6.6%WPLN: 2.4%Halo Effect8.5%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 1.4%WPLN: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.7%Justin Barney: 3.2%WPLN: 1.6%Recency Bias9.7%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.6%Justin Barney: 8.9%WPLN: 3.2%Appeal to Authority14.6%This article: 6.1%Justin Barney: 2.0%WPLN: 1.0%False Dilemma6.1%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 20.8%Justin Barney: 11.1%WPLN: 3.9%Hasty Generalization20.8%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 1.4%WPLN: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.8%Justin Barney: 1.3%WPLN: 0.3%Bandwagon3.8%This article: 10.0%Justin Barney: 4.6%WPLN: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion10.0%This article: 2.2%Justin Barney: 0.7%WPLN: 0.6%Begging the Question2.2%This article: 8.8%Justin Barney: 2.9%WPLN: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.8%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.4%Justin Barney: 1.8%WPLN: 0.8%Burden of Proof5.4%This article: 0.4%Justin Barney: 0.1%WPLN: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.4%This article: 0.8%Justin Barney: 0.3%WPLN: 0.2%Composition/Division0.8%This article: 5.5%Justin Barney: 5.7%WPLN: 2.9%Anecdotal5.5%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.8%Justin Barney: 3.5%WPLN: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.8%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.5%WPLN: 1.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Justin Barney: 0.0%WPLN: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Justin Barney: 1.0%WPLN: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.0%

958 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers40%attributed speech573writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDean Fick • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDean Fick • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageBob Roberts • 6 words • 0.0% coverageBob Roberts • 9 words • 0.0% coverageBob Roberts • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDave Fick • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDave Fick • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDave Fick • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDave Fick • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDave Fick • 40 words • 0.0% coverageDave Fick • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDave Fick • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageBrooks LeBoeuf • 14 words • 0.0% coverageBrooks LeBoeuf • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageBrooks LeBoeuf • 21 words • 0.0% coverageBrooks LeBoeuf • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageBrooks LeBoeuf • 17 words • 0.0% coverageBrooks LeBoeuf • 21 words • 0.0% coverageBrooks LeBoeuf • 16 words • 0.0% coverageBrooks LeBoeuf • 10 words • 0.0% coverageBrooks LeBoeuf • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Brooks LeBoeuf

100%flagged-word coverage
175 attributed words45% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.1 ptsWriter: 5.1%Brooks LeBoeuf: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.