Topic summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video958 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Nolan's Filmmaking results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 318 hits. Analysis detected 2,470 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,874 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,593 of 16,562 topics). This Christopher Nolan's Filmmaking is better (less manipulative) than 57.90% of the peer group.
Christopher Nolan's Filmmaking
Topic details
Total words: 2,874
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.1% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.1%11.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos