Author summary
⁠8%5 analyzed articles/videos266 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nina Cardona results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 860 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,470 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (3,809 of 6,628 authors). This Nina Cardona is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Nina Cardona
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠43%Nina Cardona (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,470
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

43% percentile
025507510042.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.2%5.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos