Author summary
78% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,143 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Camellia Burris results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Authority , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 427 hits . Analysis detected 2,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,429 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,628 of 6,362 authors). This Camellia Burris is better (less manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group. Camellia Burris
Author details
Total words: 3,429
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 12.4%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst