Publication summary
66% 18 analyzed articles/videos 7,430 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Las Vegas Review-Journal results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 3,103 hits . Analysis detected 28,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,516 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 37% (242 of 379 publications). This Las Vegas Review-Journal is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 33,516
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score18 analyzed articles33.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst