Author summary
71% 1 analyzed article/video 557 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noble Brigham results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Self-Serving Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 269 hits . Analysis detected 2,088 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,671 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,323 of 6,296 authors). This Noble Brigham is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group. Noble Brigham
Author details
Total words: 1,671
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.0% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 12.0% 12.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.5% 11.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.3% 5.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 13.1%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 7.4%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst