Publication summary
62% 28 analyzed articles/videos 11,368 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Las Vegas Review-Journal results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 4,226 hits . Analysis detected 38,189 faulty-reasoning hits from 49,203 analyzed words across 28 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 32% (279 of 410 publications). This Las Vegas Review-Journal is better (less manipulative) than 68.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 49,203
Article count: 28
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score28 analyzed articles49.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst