Author summary
6%1 analyzed article/video261 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ron Eland Boulder City Review results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Authority, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 297 faulty-reasoning hits from 783 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,825 of 6,628 authors). This Ron Eland Boulder City Review is worse (more manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
Ron Eland Boulder City Review
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
73%Ron Eland Boulder City Review (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 783
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

73% percentile
025507510072.5% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles783 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.1%3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.2%4.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 5.5%5.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.1%3.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 5.9%5.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 2.8%2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos