Author summary
6% 1 analyzed article/video 261 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ron Eland Boulder City Review results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Appeal to Authority , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 46 hits . Analysis detected 297 faulty-reasoning hits from 783 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,825 of 6,628 authors). This Ron Eland Boulder City Review is worse (more manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group. Ron Eland Boulder City Review
Author details
Total words: 783
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.5% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles783 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.2% 4.2% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 3.1% 3.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 5.9% 5.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 2.8% 2.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst