Author summary
5%2 analyzed articles/videos332 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caitlin Lilly results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 124 hits. Analysis detected 365 faulty-reasoning hits from 996 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,246 of 6,528 authors). This Caitlin Lilly is worse (more manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group.
Caitlin Lilly
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
66%Caitlin Lilly (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 996
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

66% percentile
025507510065.6% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles996 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 12.4%12.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.6%2.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 1.5%1.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate