‘A concern’: Las Vegas gas prices going back up as world events affect oil costs 20%

By Mick Akers36%

7/24/2026, 10:15:22 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 8 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 71 hits. Analysis detected 306 faulty-reasoning hits from 453 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34.3% and a BS Rank of 20% (17,630 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the article peer group.

The Las Vegas Valley has seen gasoline prices jump 14 cents per gallon in the past week as multiple overseas conflicts rage on, creating the potential for $5-per-gallon gas. 
The average price for a gallon of regular unleaded gas in Southern Nevada was $4.72 on Friday, up from $4.58 last week, according to AAA. 
Friday’s price was a 3-cent increase from Thursday and is flat compared with a month ago. 
Motorists are paying a dollar more per gallon of gas compared with the same date in 2025, when the average price was at $3.72, AAA data shows. 
The price fluctuations are tied to multiple geopolitical factors overseas, according to Patrick De Haan, lead petroleum analyst with GasBuddy. 
“Oil prices are down today, but they’re still up quite a bit from last week,” De Haan said Friday. 
“Today’s drop has to do with Pakistan trying to get the U.S. and Iran back to the same table. 
” 
De Haan said the challenges involve more than the U.S. and Iran, however. 
“The Houthis attacking in the Red Sea is problematic because it interrupts the flow of Russian crude oil. 
In addition, Ukraine’s attacks on Russian oil refineries are also pretty problematic,” he said. 
“Russia has curbed the export of diesel — one out of every nine gallons produced globally of diesel comes from Russia. 
So that’s even more critical to the price of diesel. 
” 
Prices for Brent crude oil hit a six-week high on Thursday at $100 per barrel, before seeing a decrease Friday, closing at $96.51. 
But the recent surge signals a further increase in retail prices is looming. 
De Haan said all of the issues are combining to drive up fuel prices. 
Every state is reporting price increases, and the national average for a gallon of unleaded is 11 cents higher than the same day last week, De Haan said. 
If the compounding issues persist overseas, gas prices will continue to rise, with a $5 per gallon average in Southern Nevada not out of the realm of possibility. 
“If it continues for a few more weeks, absolutely (prices could hit $5),” De Haan said. 
“You (Las Vegas) were last above $5 in early June, and then you slipped back below that on about June 7th. 
So, it’s been a month and a half since you last saw $5, but your peak was about $5.29 back on May 22nd. 
… I don’t think you’ll get there based on where we are at this moment, but the longer these situations go unaddressed, the more of a concern. 
” 
Contact Mick Akers at makers@reviewjournal.com or 702-387-2920. 
Follow @mickakers on X. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 1.6%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 3.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 15.7%Mick Akers: 5.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.1%Anchoring Bias15.7%This article: 6.4%Mick Akers: 2.2%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 2.9%Availability Heuristic6.4%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Mick Akers: 5.7%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 5.3%Framing Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 2.4%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 2.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.0%Mick Akers: 3.9%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.7%Pessimism Bias15.0%This article: 9.7%Mick Akers: 6.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 8.6%Negativity Bias9.7%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 2.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.1%Mick Akers: 1.1%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.1%Recency Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 3.3%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 4.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 6.2%Mick Akers: 1.3%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.0%Slippery Slope6.2%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.2%Mick Akers: 1.3%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 3.7%Hasty Generalization6.2%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 6.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 1.2%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 2.8%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 1.6%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 2.9%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 1.4%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 2.9%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.0%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mick Akers: 0.8%Las Vegas Review-Journal: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

453 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker42%attributed speech262writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick De Haan • 19 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick De Haan • 19 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick De Haan • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick De Haan • 18 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick De Haan • 14 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick De Haan • 21 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick De Haan • 10 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick De Haan • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick De Haan • 16 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick De Haan • 21 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick De Haan • 23 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick De Haan • 27 words • 0.0% coveragePatrick De Haan • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Patrick De Haan

37%flagged-word coverage
191 attributed words100% of attributed speech62% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.