Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video47 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick de Haan results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 86% saturation with 42.163 hits. Analysis detected 73.163 faulty-reasoning hits from 47 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 71.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,781 of 28,364 speakers). This Patrick de Haan is worse (more manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group.
Patrick de Haan
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠80%Patrick de Haan (selected)72%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 47
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.6% percentile
71.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos47 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 86.0%86.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 56.4%56.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 86.0%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 56.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos