Keyword summary
64%88 analyzed articles/videos88,859 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Geopolitics results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 35,164 hits. Analysis detected 371,877 faulty-reasoning hits from 433,180 analyzed words across 88 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,292 of 37,321 keywords). This Geopolitics is better (less manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
Geopolitics

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

11% percentile
025507510010.8% percentile
1.6% BS Score88 analyzed articles433.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Egypt is quietly massing troops on Israel’s border. It’s time for an ‘Abrahamic NATO’84%
Washington Examiner73%By Jose Lev Alvarez97%7/24/2026, 12:00:00 PM
Iran and the New Rules of Global Power3%
Foreign Affairs46%By Robert A. Pape0%7/24/2026, 4:00:00 AM
The Small Suffer What They Must?66%
Foreign Affairs46%By Tom Long85% Stewart Patrick85%7/23/2026, 4:00:00 AM
China’s Moment of Weakness10%
Foreign Affairs46%By Logan Wright0%7/23/2026, 4:00:00 AM
EU leaders to discuss AI — later this year96%
Semafor84%By J.D. Capelouto89%7/22/2026, 11:03:28 PM
Riyadh wins US nuclear concessions84%
Semafor84%By Matthew Martin92%7/22/2026, 1:03:59 PM
On the Brink Again89%
Quillette65%By Benny Morris94%7/22/2026, 9:57:25 AM
China Pitches Its AI Leadership to the World13%
Foreign Policy32%By Joseph Rachman17%7/22/2026, 5:00:59 AM
The Lesson Trump Can Take From Herodotus’ Paradox80%
The American Conservative86%By Daniel E. Zoughbie95%7/22/2026, 4:03:00 AM
Israel's Changing Strategic Calculus90%
Reason.com42%By David Bernstein98%7/21/2026, 12:46:20 PM