Author summary
95% 1 analyzed article/video 1,230 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel E. Zoughbie results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 422 hits . Analysis detected 4,583 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,690 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 69% (1,946 of 6,244 authors). This Daniel E. Zoughbie is worse (more manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. Daniel E. Zoughbie
Author details
Total words: 3,690
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.8% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 10.4% 10.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.9% 9.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.5%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Composition/Division: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst