Author summary
92% 2 analyzed articles/videos 351 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Martin results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 292 hits . Analysis detected 2,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,229 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8% and a BS Rank of 93% (499 of 6,348 authors). This Matthew Martin is worse (more manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group. Matthew Martin
Author details
Total words: 1,229
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.2% percentile 8.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 23.8% 23.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 19.2% 19.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.5% 16.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.0% 19.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 13.5% 13.5% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 15.6% 15.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.0%, sitewide 26.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 23.8%, sitewide 3.3% Negativity Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Author 19.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 15.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 10.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Slippery Slope: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst