Author summary
98%2 analyzed articles/videos560 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Bernstein results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 35.6% saturation with 886 hits. Analysis detected 5,538 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,490 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 86% (951 of 6,374 authors). This David Bernstein is worse (more manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group.
David Bernstein
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
86%David Bernstein (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,490
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

85% percentile
025507510085.1% percentile
5.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 35.6%35.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.3%9.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 15.6%15.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 17.0%17.0%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Author 9.6%9.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 7.8%7.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Author 35.6%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 15.0%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 17.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Horn Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 1.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 9.2%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 3.1%Straw Man: Author 7.8%, sitewide 0.9%In-Group Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.9%Indoctrination: Author 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.1%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Genetic Fallacy: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos