Author summary
16% 1 analyzed article/video 1,773 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Rachman results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 462 hits . Analysis detected 2,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,319 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 13% (5,392 of 6,170 authors). This Joseph Rachman is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group. Joseph Rachman
Author details
Total words: 5,319
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst