Topic summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos2,144 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gasoline Prices results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 2,195 hits. Analysis detected 17,072 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,585 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 58% (7,003 of 16,366 topics). This Gasoline Prices is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.2% percentile
3.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.0%12.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 20.7%20.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 9.0%9.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.4%15.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate