Topic summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,144 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gasoline Prices results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 2,195 hits . Analysis detected 17,072 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,585 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 58% (7,003 of 16,366 topics). This Gasoline Prices is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group. Gasoline Prices
Topic details
Total words: 10,585
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.2% percentile 3.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 12.0% 12.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 20.7% 20.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.4% 15.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 20.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.0%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst