Oil has surged since the Iran conflict, but gas prices may not be done rising 90%

By Bradford Betz0%

3/28/2026, 3:00:46 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 34.1% saturation with 184 hits. Analysis detected 1,115 faulty-reasoning hits from 539 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 82.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (2,287 of 21,182 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 89.20% of the article peer group.

Oil prices have surged more than 40% since the start of the Iran conflict, rattling global energy markets and raising concerns that U.S. drivers could see further increases at the pump. 
Analysts say consumers may not have felt the full impact yet because higher crude costs typically take weeks to filter through to retail gasoline prices. 
Even if oil stabilizes, pump prices could continue rising in the near term. 
"More than likely there is more to come, because there’s usually a lag between crude prices and what consumers pay at the pump," said Phil Flynn, a FOX Business contributor and senior market analyst at Price Futures Group. 
IRAN WAR COULD PUSH INFLATION HIGHER THIS YEAR, GOLDMAN SACHS SAYS 
Michael Mische, a supply chain expert and professor at the University of Southern California, also predicted the worst is not over, telling FOX Business, "There's more still to come." 
"There is a lag, and prices will continue to work their way through the system," he added. 
U.S. benchmark West Texas Intermediate crude closed at $99.64 a barrel on Friday, remaining elevated after a volatile stretch tied to the conflict. 
While prices were on track for their first weekly decline in more than a month, they remain sharply higher than pre-conflict levels. 
The rally follows supply disruptions linked to U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran, which analysts estimate have removed roughly 10 million to 11 million barrels per day from global markets, tightening supply. 
Geopolitical uncertainty continues to drive the market. 
The U.S. has extended a deadline for Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz  a critical route for global oil shipments  while also weighing additional military action. 
Prices could fall if the conflict eases but are likely to remain above pre-conflict levels, while a prolonged escalation could push prices higher. 
IRAN WAR FUELS ASIA ENERGY CRUNCH AS INDIA, JAPAN, OTHERS FEEL STRAIN 
"Even with this supply shock, the increase has been relatively orderly, and it could have been much worse," Flynn said. 
But Mische noted that strong domestic production has helped cushion the impact. 
"If we didn’t have current U.S. production levels, we would be in a real mess," he said. 
For consumers, gasoline prices have already begun to rise, but further increases may be ahead as the earlier crude spike continues to pass through the system. 
The national average price for regular gasoline stood at roughly $3.98 per gallon, according to AAA, up about 6 cents from a week ago and nearly $1 higher than a month ago. 
GasBuddy data shows a similar trend, with prices rising about 7 cents week over week and more than $1 over the past month. 
That increase largely reflects earlier gains in oil, and because retail fuel prices lag behind crude movements, analysts expect additional upward pressure in the coming weeks. 
CLICK HERE TO GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO 
Seasonal factors are also contributing. 
The transition to more expensive summer gasoline blends is underway, increasing refining costs and potentially keeping pump prices elevated even if crude stabilizes. 
"Prices go up like rockets, and they come down like a feather," Mische said. 
Reuters contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 18.0%Bradford Betz: 3.5%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias18.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 2.4%FoxBusiness: 3.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 16.0%Bradford Betz: 3.7%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic16.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Bradford Betz: 4.4%FoxBusiness: 3.7%Overconfidence Bias1.3%This article: 9.1%Bradford Betz: 17.8%FoxBusiness: 13.0%Framing Effect9.1%This article: 7.2%Bradford Betz: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion7.2%This article: 2.2%Bradford Betz: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.7%Bradford Betz: 3.7%FoxBusiness: 8.8%Optimism Bias3.7%This article: 34.1%Bradford Betz: 1.7%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias34.1%This article: 14.7%Bradford Betz: 6.6%FoxBusiness: 7.8%Negativity Bias14.7%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 3.9%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 1.6%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 1.6%FoxBusiness: 3.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.1%Bradford Betz: 1.2%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias11.1%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 1.1%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.5%Bradford Betz: 7.3%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority14.5%This article: 6.7%Bradford Betz: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma6.7%This article: 3.2%Bradford Betz: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope3.2%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 3.7%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.6%Bradford Betz: 3.4%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion2.6%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 21.3%Bradford Betz: 2.4%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)21.3%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.1%Bradford Betz: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.1%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 18.0%Bradford Betz: 1.2%FoxBusiness: 1.8%Unattributed Quote18.0%This article: 12.4%Bradford Betz: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection12.4%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 2.2%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 1.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Bradford Betz: 1.6%FoxBusiness: 2.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Bradford Betz: 2.6%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.7%

539 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers37%attributed speech338writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coveragePhil Flynn • 38 words • 100.0% coverageGoldman Sachs • 11 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Mische • 29 words • 100.0% coverageMichael Mische • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coveragePhil Flynn • 20 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Mische • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Mische • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageFOX Business • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Mische • 14 words • 100.0% coverageReuters • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Goldman Sachs

100%flagged-word coverage
11 attributed words5.5% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Unattributed Quote-24.6 ptsWriter: 24.6%Goldman Sachs: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.