Speaker summary
71% 14 analyzed articles/videos 326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Goldman Sachs results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Optimism Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 37.2% saturation with 155.088 hits . Analysis detected 857.771 faulty-reasoning hits from 326 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.5% and a BS Rank of 13% (24,804 of 28,364 speakers). This Goldman Sachs is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group. Goldman Sachs
Speaker details
Total words: 326
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.6% percentile 10.5% BS Score14 analyzed videos326 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 37.2% 37.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 28.3% 28.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 21.1% 21.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 15.1% 15.1% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 37.2%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 4.6% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Primacy Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst