Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video485 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justina Lee results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 429 hits. Analysis detected 2,350 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,221 of 6,348 authors). This Justina Lee is worse (more manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.
Justina Lee
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
81%Justina Lee (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,940
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

81% percentile
025507510080.8% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.8%8.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 7.8%7.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 22.1%22.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 22.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 11.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Author 7.8%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos