ZeroHedge⁠70%

Goldman's Top Traders Share Their Best Trade Ideas And Market Views ⁠96%

By Tyler Durden⁠61%

7/4/2026, 6:41:36 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 649 faulty-reasoning hits from 77 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 92.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (989 of 21,171 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 95.30% of the article peer group.

After a painful Q1, when the S&P tumbled as much as 5% in March after the war in Iran started, markets were beyond euphoric over the historic AI-driven meltup in Q2, which started on March 29 and led to the best quarterly performance for the S&P since covid, not to mention the best return for semiconductor stocks on record after their nearly 100% return in Q2. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 85.7%Tyler Durden: 7.5%ZeroHedge: 7.6%Confirmation Bias85.7%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.6%ZeroHedge: 1.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 4.5%ZeroHedge: 4.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.1%ZeroHedge: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 85.7%Tyler Durden: 1.3%ZeroHedge: 1.3%Hindsight Bias85.7%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.9%ZeroHedge: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.3%Tyler Durden: 10.8%ZeroHedge: 10.8%Framing Effect14.3%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.5%ZeroHedge: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 100.0%Tyler Durden: 2.1%ZeroHedge: 2.1%Optimism Bias100.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 3.7%ZeroHedge: 3.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 85.7%Tyler Durden: 11.1%ZeroHedge: 11.1%Negativity Bias85.7%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.4%ZeroHedge: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.1%ZeroHedge: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.2%ZeroHedge: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.9%ZeroHedge: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.8%ZeroHedge: 0.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 85.7%Tyler Durden: 3.2%ZeroHedge: 3.3%Recency Bias85.7%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.3%ZeroHedge: 1.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.5%ZeroHedge: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.3%Tyler Durden: 6.4%ZeroHedge: 6.4%Appeal to Authority14.3%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.2%ZeroHedge: 2.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.4%ZeroHedge: 2.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.3%ZeroHedge: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 6.6%ZeroHedge: 6.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.7%ZeroHedge: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 85.7%Tyler Durden: 5.1%ZeroHedge: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion85.7%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.5%ZeroHedge: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 85.7%Tyler Durden: 5.4%ZeroHedge: 5.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)85.7%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.3%ZeroHedge: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.7%ZeroHedge: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.2%ZeroHedge: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.7%ZeroHedge: 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.2%ZeroHedge: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 4.1%ZeroHedge: 4.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.9%ZeroHedge: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 100.0%Tyler Durden: 10.6%ZeroHedge: 10.6%Biased Writer Voice100.0%This article: 85.7%Tyler Durden: 1.4%ZeroHedge: 1.4%Indoctrination85.7%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.5%ZeroHedge: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.7%ZeroHedge: 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 14.3%Tyler Durden: 0.9%ZeroHedge: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…14.3%

77 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker14%attributed speech66writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Goldman Sachs • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 66 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Goldman Sachs

100%flagged-word coverage
11 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Indoctrination-100.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%Goldman Sachs: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Goldman Sachs: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+0.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%Goldman Sachs: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.