Topic summary
ā 73% 21 analyzed articles/videos 8,836 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Market Analysis results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 3,998 hits . Analysis detected 44,978 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,114 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ā 48% (8,334 of 15,854 topics). This Market Analysis is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group. Market Analysis
Topic details
Total words: 32,114
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.4% percentile 2.9% BS Score21 analyzed articles32.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.4% 12.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst