ZeroHedge⁠72%

"Signs Of Panic": Goldman Derivs Guru Warns AI Credit Blowout Spilling Over To Entire Market ⁠98%

By Tyler Durden⁠63%

7/19/2026, 4:15:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Recency Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 84.8% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 798 faulty-reasoning hits from 105 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 96.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (607 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 97.20% of the article peer group.

One week ago we were delighted to see that none other than Goldman's top derivatives trader, Brian Garrett, echoed what we had been warning for nearly a year, namely that the real risk to AI stocks was not within the stock market at all, but rather with bonds, where spreads had been aggressively ramping wider in recent weeks as the market's concerns about return on hyperscaler investment once again spilled over into credit land... 
Hyperscaler bond basket: another day, another record wide https://t.co/Ge41UpsaL9 pic.twitter.com/nssT8MoTeH 
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) July 15, 2026 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 70.5%Tyler Durden: 7.7%ZeroHedge: 7.8%Confirmation Bias70.5%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.6%ZeroHedge: 1.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Tyler Durden: 4.6%ZeroHedge: 4.6%Availability Heuristic9.5%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.1%ZeroHedge: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 70.5%Tyler Durden: 1.4%ZeroHedge: 1.4%Hindsight Bias70.5%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.8%ZeroHedge: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 14.3%Tyler Durden: 10.8%ZeroHedge: 10.8%Framing Effect14.3%This article: 70.5%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Loss Aversion70.5%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.5%ZeroHedge: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.0%ZeroHedge: 2.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 70.5%Tyler Durden: 3.7%ZeroHedge: 3.8%Pessimism Bias70.5%This article: 29.5%Tyler Durden: 11.1%ZeroHedge: 11.1%Negativity Bias29.5%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.4%ZeroHedge: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.1%ZeroHedge: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.2%ZeroHedge: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.3%ZeroHedge: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.0%ZeroHedge: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.8%ZeroHedge: 0.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 80.0%Tyler Durden: 3.2%ZeroHedge: 3.3%Recency Bias80.0%This article: 70.5%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Primacy Effect70.5%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.4%ZeroHedge: 1.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.6%ZeroHedge: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 70.5%Tyler Durden: 6.2%ZeroHedge: 6.2%Appeal to Authority70.5%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.2%ZeroHedge: 2.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.4%ZeroHedge: 2.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.3%ZeroHedge: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 6.7%ZeroHedge: 6.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.8%ZeroHedge: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 14.3%Tyler Durden: 5.1%ZeroHedge: 5.1%Appeal to Emotion14.3%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.5%ZeroHedge: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 70.5%Tyler Durden: 5.4%ZeroHedge: 5.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)70.5%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.7%ZeroHedge: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.5%Tyler Durden: 2.2%ZeroHedge: 2.2%Anecdotal9.5%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.7%ZeroHedge: 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.2%ZeroHedge: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 15.2%Tyler Durden: 4.1%ZeroHedge: 4.1%Unattributed Quote15.2%This article: 9.5%Tyler Durden: 1.9%ZeroHedge: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection9.5%This article: 84.8%Tyler Durden: 11.2%ZeroHedge: 11.2%Biased Writer Voice84.8%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.5%ZeroHedge: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.5%ZeroHedge: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.8%ZeroHedge: 2.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.9%ZeroHedge: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

105 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.