Topic summary
70% 12 analyzed articles/videos 4,294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Investment Strategy results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Overconfidence Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 1,614 hits . Analysis detected 22,767 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,364 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 49% (8,546 of 16,562 topics). This Investment Strategy is better (less manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group. Investment Strategy
Topic details
Total words: 18,364
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.4% percentile 2.9% BS Score12 analyzed articles18.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.5% 8.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst