Author summary
42% 2 analyzed articles/videos 281 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Min results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 532 hits . Analysis detected 3,531 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,968 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (2,963 of 6,170 authors). This Sarah Min is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group. Sarah Min
Author details
Total words: 3,968
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst