CNBC55%

Jim Cramer questions whether Wednesday's rally in Big Tech will have staying power 65%

By Alexa LoMonaco62%

7/15/2026, 10:46:06 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 101 hits. Analysis detected 649 faulty-reasoning hits from 439 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (7,510 of 21,203 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the article peer group.

CNBC's Jim Cramer said Wednesday that Wall Street's rally in Big Tech looked more like a burst of optimism than a reflection of much-improved fundamentals. 
"I will tell you that I think today's impressionist judgment may not hold up under close scrutiny," the "Mad Money" host said. 
Technology stocks climbed Wednesday as investors embraced a chain of positive developments. 
Cramer, however, questioned whether the moves accurately reflected the companies' underlying outlooks. 
Alphabet jumped more than 3% after Warren Buffett told CNBC's Becky Quick that he personally made the decision for Berkshire Hathaway to invest in the Google parent. 
Cramer said that disclosure eased concerns that Buffett might be worried about Alphabet's heavy artificial intelligence spending, including bond sales . 
Berkshire first took a stake in Alphabet in the third quarter of 2025 . 
"That's the endorsement people have been looking for," Cramer said. 
Cramer also highlighted Microsoft , which rallied about 2.5% after a bullish Citi note said they expect a strong fiscal 2026 fourth quarter, with momentum building into fiscal 2027 from its Copilot and Azure cloud. 
He said the report is "so counter to the realist wisdom of the situation" and pushed back against all of his concerns about the software giant's AI strategy . 
Meta and Amazon each increased roughly 3%. 
While he thinks Meta continued to climb after unveiling plans to sell excess compute capacity on July 1, Cramer said Amazon remains difficult to justify given "it's spending fortunes on AI but still doesn't seem to be able to show any return to date." 
Meanwhile, he noted that some of the companies most closely tied to AI infrastructure moved in the opposite direction. 
Cramer pointed to weakness in names such as Dell and Micron , despite what he described as strong underlying fundamentals. 
Dell and Micron dropped about 10% and 8%, respectively. 
The disconnect, he said, reinforces his view that the market's day-to-day fluctuations are driven by shifting sentiment, rather than material new updates that justify repositioning. 
Looking ahead, Cramer said he expects investors to return their focus to fundamentals, particularly as second-quarter earnings season progresses. 
Cramer's Charitable Trust , the portfolio run by CNBC's Investing Club, owns shares of Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, and Microsoft. 
Sign up now for the CNBC Investing Club to follow Jim Cramer's every move in the market. 
Disclaimer 
Questions for Cramer? 
Call Cramer: 1-800-743-CNBC 
Want to take a deep dive into Cramer's world? 
Hit him up! 
Mad Money Twitter - Jim Cramer Twitter - Facebook - Instagram 
Questions, comments, suggestions for the "Mad Money" website? 
madcap@cnbc.com 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.5%Alexa LoMonaco: 9.8%CNBC: 4.5%Confirmation Bias10.5%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.2%CNBC: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 2.0%CNBC: 3.2%Availability Heuristic8.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.0%CNBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 5.3%CNBC: 2.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 3.3%CNBC: 6.7%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 10.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.6%CNBC: 0.8%Loss Aversion10.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.6%CNBC: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 6.9%CNBC: 7.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 2.6%CNBC: 2.2%Pessimism Bias3.0%This article: 23.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 4.3%CNBC: 6.6%Negativity Bias23.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.5%CNBC: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.5%CNBC: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error6.6%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.4%CNBC: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.2%CNBC: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Alexa LoMonaco: 3.2%CNBC: 3.0%Halo Effect2.3%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Alexa LoMonaco: 2.8%CNBC: 2.2%Recency Bias4.3%This article: 4.3%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.3%CNBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect4.3%This article: 9.6%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.7%CNBC: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias9.6%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.4%Alexa LoMonaco: 6.1%CNBC: 4.9%Appeal to Authority16.4%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.8%CNBC: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.9%CNBC: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.7%Alexa LoMonaco: 8.3%CNBC: 4.3%Hasty Generalization5.7%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.5%CNBC: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.6%CNBC: 2.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 5.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.3%CNBC: 0.7%Begging the Question5.0%This article: 4.3%Alexa LoMonaco: 2.1%CNBC: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.3%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.0%CNBC: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.3%CNBC: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.6%CNBC: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.1%CNBC: 1.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.2%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.8%CNBC: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.2%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.6%CNBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.3%Alexa LoMonaco: 2.1%CNBC: 2.6%Unattributed Quote2.3%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.2%CNBC: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 5.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.7%CNBC: 3.6%Biased Writer Voice5.0%This article: 3.9%Alexa LoMonaco: 2.5%CNBC: 1.0%Indoctrination3.9%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 12.5%Alexa LoMonaco: 9.0%CNBC: 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…12.5%

439 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers77%attributed speech100writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 25 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWarren Buffett • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 21 words • 0.0% coverageBerkshire Hathaway • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 10 words • 100.0% coverageJim Cramer • 35 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 44 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 25 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageCNBC Investing Club • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

CNBC Investing Club

100%flagged-word coverage
17 attributed words5.0% of attributed speech71% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Indoctrination+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%CNBC Investing Club: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +62.0 ptsWriter: 38.0%CNBC Investing Club: 100.0%100.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.