Topic summary
70% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,072 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Big Tech results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 2,500 hits . Analysis detected 23,398 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,912 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (10,978 of 15,988 topics). This Big Tech is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Big Tech
Topic details
Total words: 20,912
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.3% percentile 2.2% BS Score6 analyzed articles20.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst