Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,862 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Marriott results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 999 hits. Analysis detected 8,358 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,664 of 6,135 authors). This Hannah Marriott is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
Hannah Marriott
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
57%Hannah Marriott (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,448
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

57% percentile
025507510056.6% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.4%13.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.1%12.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.1%3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos