Keyword summary
51%8 analyzed articles/videos3,637 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Cramer results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 1,620 hits. Analysis detected 12,860 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,659 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,497 of 36,715 keywords). This Jim Cramer is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group.
Jim Cramer
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
42%Jim Cramer (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,659
Article count: 8
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

42% percentile
025507510041.5% percentile
2.5% BS Score8 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate