CNBC54%

Jim Cramer says the pullback in this aerospace giant is a buying opportunity 67%

By Alexa LoMonaco62%

7/16/2026, 4:11:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Confirmation Bias, and Indoctrination, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 828 faulty-reasoning hits from 394 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60.6% and a BS Rank of 67% (7,302 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 66.60% of the article peer group.

CNBC’s Jim Cramer said Thursday that investors are overlooking another strong quarter from GE Aerospace . 
"If you already own it, I think you should hold onto it," the " Mad Money " host said. 
"And if you don't own it and you want a non-tech company with real growth, this is your chance to start a position." 
The jet engine maker fell more than 4% Thursday despite reporting better-than-expected second-quarter results and raising its full-year outlook. 
The stock is now down almost 9% from its record close on July 6. 
GE Aerospace is the remaining company that emerged after the General Electric conglomerate spun-off its power business GE Vernova in April 2024. 
It had separated its medical technology unit GE Healthcare the year before that . 
"This company just reported a terrific beat and raise quarter, yet you're not just getting that quarter for free, you're getting it for a sizable discount," he said. 
"I think that makes for a tremendous buying opportunity." 
Cramer said the GE Aerospace sell-off appeared to stem from a slowdown in order growth after an exceptionally strong stretch. 
Orders rose 17% in the quarter, down from 87% growth in the first quarter, but he argued investors are putting too much weight on a single quarter. 
"Orders in aerospace are famously lumpy, so I'm not too worried about quarter-to-quarter fluctuations here," he said. 
He noted GE Aerospace's backlog has climbed to more than $210 billion  representing more than four years of revenue at the company's current pace  underscoring the strength of demand despite concerns about orders. 
Cramer also acknowledged that the company's updated guidance implies slower revenue growth in the second half of the year, but said GE has a long history of issuing conservative forecasts and could ultimately outperform its own projections. 
Beyond the quarterly numbers, Cramer said he remains encouraged by management's efforts to streamline manufacturing and ease supply-chain bottlenecks through its "Flight Deck" operating model. 
Sign up now for the CNBC Investing Club to follow Jim Cramer's every move in the market. 
Disclaimer Questions for Cramer? 
Call Cramer: 1-800-743-CNBC Want to take a deep dive into Cramer's world? 
Hit him up! 
Mad Money Twitter - Jim Cramer Twitter - Facebook - Instagram Questions, comments, suggestions for the "Mad Money" website? 
madcap@cnbc.com 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 18.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 9.8%CNBC: 4.6%Confirmation Bias18.0%This article: 3.6%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.2%CNBC: 1.9%Anchoring Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 2.0%CNBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 4.3%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.0%CNBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.3%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Alexa LoMonaco: 5.3%CNBC: 2.8%Overconfidence Bias2.3%This article: 10.4%Alexa LoMonaco: 3.3%CNBC: 6.5%Framing Effect10.4%This article: 5.8%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.6%CNBC: 0.8%Loss Aversion5.8%This article: 4.8%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.6%CNBC: 0.8%Status Quo Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 25.1%Alexa LoMonaco: 6.9%CNBC: 7.7%Optimism Bias25.1%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 2.6%CNBC: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.4%Alexa LoMonaco: 4.3%CNBC: 6.4%Negativity Bias8.4%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.5%CNBC: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.5%CNBC: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.4%CNBC: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.2%CNBC: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 15.2%Alexa LoMonaco: 3.2%CNBC: 2.9%Halo Effect15.2%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.9%Alexa LoMonaco: 2.8%CNBC: 2.2%Recency Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.3%CNBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.7%CNBC: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 6.1%CNBC: 5.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 5.8%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.8%CNBC: 1.0%False Dilemma5.8%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.9%CNBC: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.2%Alexa LoMonaco: 8.3%CNBC: 4.2%Hasty Generalization13.2%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.3%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.5%CNBC: 0.6%Bandwagon3.3%This article: 0.8%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.6%CNBC: 2.5%Appeal to Emotion0.8%This article: 7.1%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.3%CNBC: 0.7%Begging the Question7.1%This article: 14.5%Alexa LoMonaco: 2.1%CNBC: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.5%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.0%CNBC: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 4.3%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.3%CNBC: 0.1%Appeal to Nature4.3%This article: 8.9%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.6%CNBC: 0.2%Composition/Division8.9%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.1%CNBC: 1.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.2%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.8%CNBC: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.2%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.6%CNBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 2.1%CNBC: 2.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.2%CNBC: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.7%CNBC: 3.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 17.3%Alexa LoMonaco: 2.5%CNBC: 0.9%Indoctrination17.3%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 19.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 9.0%CNBC: 5.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…19.0%

394 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker68%attributed speech125writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Jim Cramer • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 19 words • 100.0% coverageJim Cramer • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 28 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 9 words • 100.0% coverageJim Cramer • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 35 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 37 words • 0.0% coverageJim Cramer • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jim Cramer

100%flagged-word coverage
269 attributed words100% of attributed speech68% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -33.0 ptsWriter: 41.6%Jim Cramer: 8.6%8.6%Indoctrination+5.4 ptsWriter: 13.6%Jim Cramer: 19.0%19.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.