Speaker summary
57%5 analyzed articles/videos1,258 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Cramer results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 200.6 hits. Analysis detected 2,570.021 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,258 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,928 of 28,364 speakers). This Jim Cramer is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group.
Jim Cramer
Speaker details
Total words: 1,258
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751001.5% percentile
4.1% BS Score5 analyzed videos1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.7%12.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.1%3.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate