Speaker summary
57% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,258 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jim Cramer results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 200.6 hits . Analysis detected 2,570.021 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,258 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,928 of 28,364 speakers). This Jim Cramer is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group. Jim Cramer
Speaker details
Total words: 1,258
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.5% percentile 4.1% BS Score5 analyzed videos1.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 12.7% 12.7% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 8.2% 8.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst