CNBC⁠54%

Cramer's lightning round: Buy Carpenter Technology ⁠78%

By Alexa LoMonaco⁠62%

7/9/2026, 3:51:18 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Burden of Proof, and Confirmation Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 551 faulty-reasoning hits from 185 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 68.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (5,013 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the article peer group.

Lemonade : "I wish they could make some money ... 
That would make it into a better stock and a better company." 
Aurora Innovation : "I am not going to make a determination on Aurora Innovation until I get Chris Urmson on." 
Weyerhaeuser : "If rates go up, this stock goes down, and people think rates are going higher. 
If you think rates are going lower ultimately, then you would start buying the stock right here. 
I'm more bullish on it than the rest of Wall Street." 
Carpenter Technology : "[Buy, buy, buy]. 
You have a terrific company there. 
What a great chart too. 
I think I would buy some here and buy some if it comes down. 
But definitely add some right here." 
Sign up now for the CNBC Investing Club to follow Jim Cramer's every move in the market. 
Questions for Cramer? 
Call Cramer: 1-800-743-CNBC 
Want to take a deep dive into Cramer's world? 
Hit him up! 
Mad Money Twitter - Jim Cramer Twitter - Facebook - Instagram 
Questions, comments, suggestions for the "Mad Money" website? 
madcap@cnbc.com 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 22.2%Alexa LoMonaco: 9.8%CNBC: 4.6%Confirmation Bias22.2%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.2%CNBC: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Alexa LoMonaco: 2.0%CNBC: 3.1%Availability Heuristic9.2%This article: 11.9%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.0%CNBC: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic11.9%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 24.3%Alexa LoMonaco: 5.3%CNBC: 2.8%Overconfidence Bias24.3%This article: 14.6%Alexa LoMonaco: 3.3%CNBC: 6.5%Framing Effect14.6%This article: 16.8%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.6%CNBC: 0.8%Loss Aversion16.8%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.6%CNBC: 0.8%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.7%Alexa LoMonaco: 6.9%CNBC: 7.7%Optimism Bias9.7%This article: 5.4%Alexa LoMonaco: 2.6%CNBC: 2.1%Pessimism Bias5.4%This article: 9.2%Alexa LoMonaco: 4.3%CNBC: 6.4%Negativity Bias9.2%This article: 5.9%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.5%CNBC: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.5%CNBC: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.4%CNBC: 0.7%In-Group Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.2%CNBC: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Alexa LoMonaco: 3.2%CNBC: 2.9%Halo Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.2%Alexa LoMonaco: 2.8%CNBC: 2.2%Recency Bias9.2%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.3%CNBC: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.7%CNBC: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 20.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 6.1%CNBC: 5.0%Appeal to Authority20.0%This article: 9.2%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.8%CNBC: 1.0%False Dilemma9.2%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.9%CNBC: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 8.3%CNBC: 4.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 12.4%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.5%CNBC: 0.6%Bandwagon12.4%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.6%CNBC: 2.5%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 6.5%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.3%CNBC: 0.7%Begging the Question6.5%This article: 9.2%Alexa LoMonaco: 2.1%CNBC: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.2%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 23.2%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.0%CNBC: 0.4%Burden of Proof23.2%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.3%CNBC: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.6%CNBC: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.2%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.1%CNBC: 1.3%Anecdotal3.2%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.1%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.8%CNBC: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.1%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.6%CNBC: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 20.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 2.1%CNBC: 2.5%Unattributed Quote20.0%This article: 6.5%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.2%CNBC: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection6.5%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 1.7%CNBC: 3.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 1.6%Alexa LoMonaco: 2.5%CNBC: 0.9%Indoctrination1.6%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alexa LoMonaco: 0.0%CNBC: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 30.3%Alexa LoMonaco: 9.0%CNBC: 5.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…30.3%

185 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers15%attributed speech157writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageCNBC Investing Club • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageMad Money • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

CNBC Investing Club

100%flagged-word coverage
17 attributed words61% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +82.2 ptsWriter: 17.8%CNBC Investing Club: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-23.6 ptsWriter: 23.6%CNBC Investing Club: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-7.6 ptsWriter: 7.6%CNBC Investing Club: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-1.9 ptsWriter: 1.9%CNBC Investing Club: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.