Author summary
77% 3 analyzed articles/videos 265 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Market Ear results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 202 hits . Analysis detected 1,890 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,387 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,242 of 6,628 authors). This The Market Ear is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group. The Market Ear
Author details
Total words: 1,387
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.3% percentile 4.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.5% 12.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 14.6% 14.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.6% 6.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.6% 13.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 15.9% Recency Bias: Author 14.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.7%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst