Author summary
96%1 analyzed article/video532 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hugh Son results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 446 hits. Analysis detected 1,919 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 86% (940 of 6,410 authors). This Hugh Son is worse (more manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group.
Hugh Son
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
86%Hugh Son (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,596
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

85% percentile
025507510085.3% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 27.9%27.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 17.8%17.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.3%4.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.6%2.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Pessimism Bias: Author 27.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 17.8%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Author 11.2%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Circular Reasoning: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos