ZeroHedge⁠70%

Hartnett: "Red, White And Boom" ⁠83%

By Tyler Durden⁠61%

7/4/2026, 11:16:25 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Primacy Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 60.3% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 344 faulty-reasoning hits from 116 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (3,609 of 21,164 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 83.00% of the article peer group.

For the holiday weekend, BofA's Michael Harnett is out with a quick market update in his latest *Flow Show *note. 
The BofA CIO starts off by analyzing the latest "Tale of the Tape" which, as we enter the second half, is split in two: first, **there are the Q2 AI/US boom leaders: ** *SOX 88%, KOSPI 64%, biotech 24%, small cap 21%, and banks 17%. 
* On the other end, are the **Q2 war/inflation laggards: ** Saudi -4%, China -10%, gold -14%, bitcoin -14%, energy -15%, defense -16%, oil -31%. 
He also notes that the **ratio of Treasuries to gold is breaking the 2020s down-trend**, which hints at peak inflationary de-globalization. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 38.8%Tyler Durden: 7.5%ZeroHedge: 7.6%Confirmation Bias38.8%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.6%ZeroHedge: 1.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 4.5%ZeroHedge: 4.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.1%ZeroHedge: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 18.1%Tyler Durden: 1.3%ZeroHedge: 1.3%Hindsight Bias18.1%This article: 18.1%Tyler Durden: 2.9%ZeroHedge: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias18.1%This article: 60.3%Tyler Durden: 10.8%ZeroHedge: 10.8%Framing Effect60.3%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.5%ZeroHedge: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.1%ZeroHedge: 2.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 21.6%Tyler Durden: 3.7%ZeroHedge: 3.7%Pessimism Bias21.6%This article: 21.6%Tyler Durden: 11.1%ZeroHedge: 11.1%Negativity Bias21.6%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.4%ZeroHedge: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.1%ZeroHedge: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.2%ZeroHedge: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.9%ZeroHedge: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.8%ZeroHedge: 0.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 3.2%ZeroHedge: 3.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 38.8%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Primacy Effect38.8%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.3%ZeroHedge: 1.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.5%ZeroHedge: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 6.4%ZeroHedge: 6.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 21.6%Tyler Durden: 2.2%ZeroHedge: 2.2%False Dilemma21.6%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.4%ZeroHedge: 2.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.3%ZeroHedge: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 6.6%ZeroHedge: 6.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.7%ZeroHedge: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 5.1%ZeroHedge: 5.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.5%ZeroHedge: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 18.1%Tyler Durden: 5.4%ZeroHedge: 5.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)18.1%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.3%ZeroHedge: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.7%ZeroHedge: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.4%ZeroHedge: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.2%ZeroHedge: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 18.1%Tyler Durden: 2.7%ZeroHedge: 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)18.1%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.0%ZeroHedge: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.1%ZeroHedge: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.2%ZeroHedge: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 4.1%ZeroHedge: 4.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 4.3%Tyler Durden: 1.9%ZeroHedge: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection4.3%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 10.6%ZeroHedge: 10.6%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 1.4%ZeroHedge: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 0.5%ZeroHedge: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Tyler Durden: 2.7%ZeroHedge: 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 17.2%Tyler Durden: 0.9%ZeroHedge: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…17.2%

116 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker4.3%attributed speech111writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Hartnett • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Hartnett

100%flagged-word coverage
5 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Hartnett: 100.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -18.0 ptsWriter: 18.0%Hartnett: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.