Topic summary
52%9 analyzed articles/videos3,388 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Trends results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 2,267 hits. Analysis detected 25,439 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,870 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (13,207 of 16,562 topics). This Economic Trends is better (less manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
Economic Trends
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510020.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score9 analyzed articles28.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate