Publication summary
21% 14 analyzed articles/videos 5,014 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ARLnow results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 1,024 hits . Analysis detected 11,416 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,851 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 12% (334 of 379 publications). This ARLnow is better (less manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group. ARLnow
Publication details
Total words: 21,851
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.9% percentile 1.2% BS Score14 analyzed articles21.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst