Author summary
31% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ARLnow.com results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 325 hits . Analysis detected 2,745 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,670 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (5,270 of 6,629 authors). This ARLnow.com is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group. ARLnow.com
Author details
Total words: 5,670
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst