Author summary
23% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,288 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tamara Chuang results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Anecdotal , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 844 hits . Analysis detected 7,883 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,201 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 11% (5,939 of 6,628 authors). This Tamara Chuang is better (less manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group. Tamara Chuang
Author details
Total words: 15,201
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.4% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst