Topic summary
64% 484 analyzed articles/videos 324,173 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Artificial Intelligence results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 120,018 hits . Analysis detected 1,362,429 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,522,351 analyzed words across 484 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (14,553 of 16,562 topics). This Artificial Intelligence is better (less manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group. Artificial Intelligence
Topic details
Total words: 1,522,351
Article count: 484
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score484 analyzed articles1.5M analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst