Author summary
83% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,688 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tyler Lacoma results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Anecdotal , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 2,713 hits . Analysis detected 14,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,064 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,554 of 6,596 authors). This Tyler Lacoma is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group. Tyler Lacoma
Author details
Total words: 14,064
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.1% percentile 2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles14.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.9% 4.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 19.3% 19.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.0% 9.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 19.3%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Author 9.6%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst